. 11
( 12)


provides a model for how such analysis might be undertaken in greater depth in The Religious
World of Antislavery Women: Spirituality in the Lives of Five Abolitionist Lecturers (New
York: Syracuse University Press, 2000). For Stanton™s religious convictions as they pertained
speci¬cally to women, see Kathi Kern, Mrs. Stanton™s Bible (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University
Press, 2001).
22 My thanks to Christopher Densmore of Friends Historical Library, Swarthmore College, for
bringing this fact to my attention. For a recent study of the Convention and its origins, see
Persistence of Quaker Constitutionalism 321

When the Society split for theological reasons, the Hicksites took some
aspects of the theology and political theory with them, the Orthodox took
others, and yet more splinter groups did the same. It is impossible to discuss all
the variations here. I will instead restrict the discussion to the strain that had
the most in¬‚uence on the reform movements “ the radical Hicksite Quakerism
of Mott and her followers “ and compare it with the traditional theory.23
When Friends separated, at issue was the locus of divine authority and, by
extension, the seat of authority in the ecclesiastical polity. To describe it very
simply, those who followed Elias Hicks came to believe that power was in
the Light (now becoming indistinguishable from reason) and the individual
conscience, while the Orthodox held that it was found in dogma, Scripture,
and the church government. Hicksites accused the Orthodox of tyranny; the
Orthodox accused the Hicksites of anarchy. The dissenters no longer sought
to convince, and the Orthodox no longer let themselves be convinced. For
the former, individual conscience took precedence over unity; for the latter,
conformity to existing ideas and structures prevailed over expression of the
individual conscience. There was no longer a via media.
Lucretia Mott was clearly the leading proponent of this brand of Hick-
site Quakerism. Her understanding of the Light, like those of most Hicksites,
emphasized individual interpretations and opposed coercion of the conscience
by the church. If Mott was not as radical as conservative Friends painted her,
her sermons were sometimes vague and suggestive in such a way that could
easily lead to extremist interpretations. A case in point is William Lloyd Gar-
rison, whose thought was shaped by Mott™s teachings. He wrote, “If my mind
has . . . become liberalized to any degree, (and I think it has burst every sec-
tarian trammel) “ if theological dogmas which I once regarded as essential to
Christianity, I now repudiate as absurd and pernicious “ I am largely indebted
to [James and Lucretia Mott] for the change.”24 He and others picked up on
Mott™s strain of theologico-political thought and developed it into the nonre-
sistance and come-outerism movements. Not only was Mott the mentor for
radical reformers such as Garrison, she also approved of their actions. “I care
not,” she said, “how radical the true inquirer may become, if a regard for true
religion is preserved.”25

Judith Wellman, The Road to Seneca Falls: Elizabeth Cady Stanton and the First Woman™s
Rights Convention (Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2004).
23 Orthodox Friends represented the withdrawing extreme of Quaker behavior. While they were
also in favor of abolition, for example, they did not openly advocate the cause, preferring
instead to undertake any efforts surreptitiously, if at all. The result was that they were accused
by some of contributing to the problem. See Ryan Jordan, Slavery and the Meetinghouse: The
Quakers and the Abolitionist Dilemma, 1820“1865 (Bloomington: Indiana University Press,
24 William Lloyd Garrison, The Liberator, November 9, 1849. See also William L. van Deberg,
“William Lloyd Garrison and the ˜Pro-Slavery Priesthood™: The Changing Beliefs of an Evan-
gelical Reformer, 1830“1840,” Journal of the American Academy of Religion vol. 43, no. 2
(1975), 224“37.
25 Lucretia Mott to Sister, 1st mo. 3rd, 1865, in Anna Davis Hallowell, ed., James and Lucretia
Mott: Life and Letters (Boston: Houghton Mif¬‚in and Co., 1884), 415.
322 The Political Quakerism of John Dickinson

Nonresistance and come-outerism were seminal to the radical activism on
abolitionism and women™s rights. And both of them were extreme interpreta-
tions of some Quaker theological tenets. Come-outerism was the idea that peo-
ple should remove themselves from the corrupt institutions of society, namely
the church and the state.26 This, of course, is a legacy of Quaker quietism
that caused some Friends to remove themselves from the civil government of
Pennsylvania. Nonresistance was an extreme paci¬st position that held that
these institutions had no right to coerce the consciences of individuals, yet they
must not be resisted by force. As Thomas Hamm has noted, this was a logical
extension of the peace testimony.27 In essence, these movements denied the
legitimacy of government and the engagement of the individual with it. Both
were based on the idea of the perfection of the individual and the notion that
when man was perfect, and under the government of God directly, he would
need no earthly government.
The advocates of these theologico-political philosophies were very conscious
of the Quaker roots of their beliefs and argued for their own continuity with
the faith and practice of early Friends and notable eighteenth-century activists.
James and Lucretia Mott proclaimed their beliefs were “in accordance with
Fox, Penn, and Barclay.”28 Mott seemed to be trying to revive the practices of
early Friends in de¬ance of how Orthodox Quakers were now portraying the
same principles “ accurately or not. “˜Our principles,™” she quoted an early
source, “˜lead us to reject and to intreat the oppressed to reject all carnal
weapons, relying solely on those which are mighty through God to the pulling
down of strongholds.™”29 Garrison and others also thought of themselves as
the heirs of these early Friends, as did Edward Burrough and, later, John
Woolman. Then in a statement that many Quakers would consider heretical,
Mott declared, “I am no advocate of passivity.” But she did not mean to
sanction overt violence. To clarify, she continued by making the distinction
that has eluded most historians for decades: “Quakerism, as I understand it,
does not mean quietism. The early Friends were agitators; disturbers of the
peace; and were more obnoxious in their day to charges which are now so
freely made than we are.”30
While Mott was correct in her interpretation of early Quaker activism,
ironically, in spite of their rhetoric of peace and salvation, there was something
quite violent and unforgiving about the paci¬sm of nonresisters. Their beliefs
were an expression of the peace testimony in one way, but, in another way,
they violated it. The philosophy of government and civic engagement that Mott,

26 Isenberg, “Pillars in the Same Temple,” 101“02; and Lewis Perry, Radical Abolitionism: Anar-
chy and the Government of God in Antislavery Thought (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press,
1973), passim.
27 Thomas D. Hamm, “Hicksite Quakerism and the Antebellum Non-resistance Movement,”
Church History vol. 63, no. 4 (1994), 557“69. See also, Hamm, God™s Government Begun.
28 James Mott to Wiliam Smeal, 8th mo. 24th, 1840, in Hallowell, Life and Letters, 178.
29 Mott, “I am no advocate of passivity,” in Greene, Lucretia Mott, 261“62, 261.
30 Ibid., 262.
Persistence of Quaker Constitutionalism 323

Garrison, Stanton, and others advocated was decidedly contrary to traditional
Quaker theologico-political thought in several ways. Although Mott was also
correct that there had always been a powerful individualistic component of
the Inward Light, early Quakers believed that it was precisely to restrict the
“scattering” tendency of the Light that God ordained the government. As we
have seen, Fox wrote the ¬rst constitution of the Quaker church to control
wayward Friends, and Barclay wrote the Anarchy of the Ranters in its defense
to explain to radical Friends why they were about to be coerced by the new
church government, and why this was part of God™s plan for them. Subsequent
Quakers in the Society and Pennsylvania government advocated a measure of
coercion to achieve unity. By contrast, Mott preached that “we are perhaps
too much taught to venerate . . . the government . . . more than is consistent
with true Quakerism or true Christianity.”31 Famously, Garrison went so far
as to burn the Constitution in public, call it “a covenant with Death and
an agreement with Hell,” and advocate its abolition.32 Such language and
behavior is clearly contrary to the peaceable conversation and walking of earlier
Quakerism. Moreover, politicians thinking in the Quaker tradition, such as
William Penn and John Dickinson, referred to the constitution and government
as sacred institutions. Nevertheless, Mott responded to Garrisonian hostility
to the Constitution by saying, “[The abolitionists] have found it their duty to
come out against the Constitution and Government of the country, as it is at
present construed . . . I am glad . . . of the progress evident in this.”33 Therefore,
while they crusaded for individual rights and rejected institutional coercion,
radical Quakers and their followers applied their own coercion to the polity
with the intent to disrupt it as much as need be to achieve their ends “ to abolish
it along with civil injustice.
What Quakers had always striven for, and what Mott, Garrison, and their
followers abandoned to one degree or another in their pursuit of individual
liberties, was the security for liberty that a balanced system would ensure.
Barclay wrote Anarchy of the Ranters (renamed blandly in 1822 A Treatise
on Church Government) in hopes that Quakers could avoid both tyranny and
anarchy in their ecclesiastical government. There was no aspect of traditional
Quaker politics that would have supported Elizabeth Cady Stanton™s goal to
“Educate women into rebellion.”34 For many, if not most Quakers, the ques-
tion had never been whether slaves should be freed or women given equal
rights, but how. In traditional Quakerism, the ends did not justify the means
because the wrong means might destroy the polity. And when the polity is
destroyed, the freedom of all is lost. As president of Delaware, John Dickinson

31 Mott, “Keep Yourselves from Idols,” in Greene, Lucretia Mott, 173“74.
32 Perry, Radical Abolitionism, 189; James H. Hutson, “The Creation of the Constitution: Schol-
arship at a Standstill,” Reviews in American History vol. 12, no. 4 (1984), 463“477, 465.
33 Mott, “Law of Progress,” in Greene, Lucretia Mott, 77“78.
34 Elizabeth Cady Stanton quoted in Sandra Stanley Holton, “˜To Educate Women into Rebellion™:
Elizabeth Cady Stanton and the Creation of a Transatlantic Network of Suffragists,” American
Historical Review vol. 99, no. 4 (1994), 1112“36.
324 The Political Quakerism of John Dickinson

drafted a bill for the gradual abolition of slavery in that state.35 Slavery was
abhorrent to him, yet he believed that cautious, measured manumission was the
only way to do it without risking the polity. Freedoms should be introduced
into society slowly in order that both individuals and the established order
can have time to adjust to adjust to it properly. Nonresisters, for their part,
abandoned the political and ecclesiastical process that in many ways de¬ned
Even as Garrison and others protested that they were following in the steps of
great reformers such as John Woolman, they rejected the conciliatory language
that more moderate Friends used to preach against slavery while also preserving
the harmony and perpetuity of the Union. Garrison wrote to Mott that “there
seems to be something like an attempt to propitiate the spirit of these cruel
and ungodly oppressors, in a way which I do not like.”36 Unlike Woolman,
Garrison had apparently given up on the possibility of salvation for these
“ungodly” people.
For nonresisters and come-outers, perfectionism was possible for individu-
als “ or rather, for some individuals. For traditional Quakers, perfectionism
also applied to the civil constitution. This idea was exempli¬ed in how Friends
actualized their ecclesiastical and civil constitutions and governments. Despite
tremendous convulsions in the early Society and in Pennsylvania government,
Friends never separated as a Society, except brie¬‚y during the Keithian Contro-
versy and during the Revolution, or resorted to the overthrow of the govern-
ment to achieve the liberties they sought. Instead, as we have seen, they worked
through peaceful extralegal means or within the system for reform rather than
Early Quakers had a theory and practice of civil disobedience that would
gradually lead to constitutional perfection, but we cannot say the same for
the most noteworthy of Quaker reformers in the nineteenth century, who
abandoned the key element that de¬ned civil disobedience “ political obliga-
tion. Although seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Quaker politicians demon-
strated in their theory and practice that profound reforms could be achieved
peacefully within the political system, prior to the Civil War, many Americans
seemed not yet to have learned this lesson. The radical Hicksites and their
followers articulated the question clearly on the minds of many Americans in
the Antebellum period: Could a constitution be amended peacefully, or must
it be abandoned when it or the union it symbolizes is imperfect?
With such a vigorous public campaign for the rights of the individual over
the collective, it is interesting to speculate about the long-term effects that radi-
cal Hicksites and their followers had on the rise of what Tocqueville, observing
Americans during this period, called individualism. Today the popular conno-
tation of this word is positive, and it is used as a synonym for individuality;

35 John Dickinson, “An Act for the Gradual Abolition of Slavery,” Logan Family Papers, vol. 30,
36 William Lloyd Garrison to Lucretia Mott, April 28, 1840, in Hallowell, Life and Letters, 140.
Persistence of Quaker Constitutionalism 325

but for Tocqueville, it was a particularly detrimental development in Ameri-
can culture. He described it as a focus on the individual to the exclusion of
the rest of society that “dams the spring of public virtues” and eventually
“attacks and destroys all the others too and ¬nally merges in egoism.”37 As
we have seen, Quakers were always concerned that many within their meeting
might develop a “libertine spirit” that was dif¬cult to keep in check. And they
recognized that non-Quakers also took this spirit away from their meetings
instead of “bearing the cross” of membership. This was most certainly at issue
with the Quaker-infused political culture in Pennsylvania before the Revolu-
tion and the disproportionate number of radical Revolutionaries that emerged
from the colony. And as certainly, if they looked, scholars would ¬nd a con-
nection between Quakerly libertinism and the rise of American individualism.
Radical Quakers and their followers left it instead to their more moderate and
more obscure brethren to show them how to advocate both rights and political
obligation at the same time.

Traditional Quaker Thought in the Nineteenth Century
Despite the dominance of radical Hicksite Quakerism in the reform movements,
the traditional strain of Quaker theologico-political thought remained in a few
thinkers and actors. Their mark was, however, relatively faint, and they have
largely disappeared from Anglo-American historical consciousness. Thomas
Clarkson and Jonathan Dymond were among the traditionalists who made an
impression both within and without the Society of Friends.38 What we see for
the ¬rst time during this period are explicit expressions of many of the principles
of Quaker theologico-politics that in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries
must be deduced mainly from their practice and theology. They articulated
the same priorities “ a strong central government with a divinely ordained
constitution, and the imperative to resist it peacefully by breaking unjust laws
with the aim of reform.
Thomas Clarkson (1760“1846) was an abolitionist and president of the
British and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society, which still exists today as Anti-Slavery
International. What is most signi¬cant about Clarkson™s writing is his near-
complete articulation of the de¬nition of civil disobedience. Following almost
exactly Edward Burrough™s statement in 1661, Clarkson wrote in 1806, “As the
governed in [the case of an unjust law] ought in obedience to God . . . refuse a
compliance with the law of their own governors, so they ought to be prepared
to submit to the penalties which are annexed to such a refusal, and on no
account, if just representations made in the quiet spirit of their religion, are not
37 Tocqueville, Democracy in America, 507.
38 Although Clarkson and Dymond were British Friends, with the strong transatlantic Quaker
network, their in¬‚uence would not have been markedly less in America than that of American
Friends. On this network, which persisted long after the American Revolution and still exists
to some extent today, see Alison Olson, “The Lobbying of London Quakers for Pennsylvania
Friends,” PMHB vol. 117, no. 3 (1993), 131“52.
326 The Political Quakerism of John Dickinson

likely to be effectual, to take up arms or resist them by force.”39 This statement
lacks only two components to make it complete. The ¬rst is the condition
that the breaking of the law must be public. At this time, publicity was still
understood by all to be the Quaker way. The other is that it should be for
change and not merely to appease the conscience. A statement of this principle
was forthcoming.
Jonathan Dymond (1796“1828), a British linen draper and political theo-
rist, gives us perhaps the most explicit discussion of civil disobedience by any
Quaker until the twentieth century.40 In Essays on the Principles of Morality
and on the Private and Political Rights and Obligations of Mankind (1829)
he lays out the tenets that have de¬ned Quaker civic engagement since nearly
the beginning and, in doing so, comes tantalizingly close to using the very
phrase in question. First, he identi¬es the imperative for political obligation
to the divinely ordained constitution. “[T]he general duty of Civil obedience,”
he writes, is “because government is an institution sanctioned by the Deity.”41
Dymond went on to articulate even more aspects typical of Quaker philosophy
than did Clarkson, including the reason“revelation dilemma, the perpetuity and
mutability of the constitution, and the popular sovereignty that could change it.
In an interesting mixture of the language of reason and progressive revelation,
he described the changeable constitution:

The science of government . . . acquires a constant accession of light. . . . Forms of Gov-
ernment should be capable of admitting, without disturbance, those improvements
which experience may dictate, or the advancing conditions may require. Upon these
grounds no constitution should be regarded as absolutely and sacredly ¬xed, so that
none ought and none have the right to alter it.

And he continued with a statement of what Quakers had known and practiced
since the establishment of their ecclesiastical polity, and which they continued
in their civil polity “ the principle of constituent sovereignty. “The question of
right,” he explained, “is easily settled. It is inherent in the community, or in
the legislature as their agents.”42
Although for some Quakers the difference between reason and the Light
was becoming negligible, a few such as Dymond still maintained the distinc-
tion, at least when it came to civil resistance. He adhered to the traditional
understanding put forth by the early Quakers that reason might allow various
courses of action, but divine revelation only one. When following the law of
nature “ the law of reason “ all means are permitted to resist government.

39 Thomas Clarkson, A Portraiture of Quakerism, 3: 7. On Clarkson, see Ellen Gibson Wilson,
Thomas Clarkson: A Biography (New York: St. Martin™s Press, 1990).
40 There is no extant biography of Dymond. For a brief discussion of his life and work, see Jones,
The Later Periods of Quakerism, 716“17.
41 Dymond, Essays on the Principles of Morality, 323, 324.
42 Ibid., 337.
Persistence of Quaker Constitutionalism 327

But, said Dymond, “When we turn from the law of nature to Christianity,
we ¬nd, as we are wont, that the moral cord is tightened, and that not every
means of opposing government for the public good is permitted to us.”43 The
government, he wrote, “should be susceptible to peaceable change”; “Chris-
tianity forbids an armed resistance to the civil power.”44 Finally, Dymond
added one of the missing components of Clarkson™s description: Disobedience
must generally be undertaken with the “view to an alteration of the existing
institutions.”45 At least one scholar of the period has found that Dymond™s
work not only pre¬gured the work of important nineteenth-century dissenters
but also likely shaped it.46
If non-Quakers have heard of Dymond, it is likely because he was read
and noted by Henry David Thoreau (1817“62). While at Harvard, Thoreau
wrote that he undertook an “examination of Mr. Dymond™s opinions.”47 But
although he read this Quaker theorist, who was very clear in his explanation
of civil disobedience, and although during his life he was surrounded by social
reform movements that had grown out of and were in large part led by Quakers,
he did not espouse or practice their teachings in their entirety. It is one of
the biggest misconceptions in American scholarship that Thoreau was a civil
disobedient. Only a few scholars have noted that his famous work, which
they call On Civil Disobedience (1866), was actually originally entitled On
Resistance to Civil Government; and this was not merely because the term civil
disobedience was not yet in use. If we adhere to the de¬nition used in this
study, Thoreau did not advocate it. Nor did he practice it in his own resistance.
He does not make acceptance of legal punishment a condition of resistance,
nor must resistance necessarily be peaceful. Further, his resistance was not
undertaken publicly. He was imprisoned for not paying taxes to support the
Mexican-American War, but he did not announce his intentions, and was
not even arrested until years later. At the time, he did it to appease his own
conscience, not to convince the world of the injustice of the war. Neither
should we overlook the fact that he openly supported violent rebellion. He
was a champion and sympathizer of John Brown™s bloody raid on Harper™s
Ferry.48 As important as Thoreau™s in¬‚uence was on later reformers, we must
look elsewhere for a theory and practice of true civil disobedience.

43 Ibid., 323.
44 Ibid., 337 and 326.
45 Ibid., 330. He quali¬es statement by saying that one ought to resist orders to commit crimes
without a view to changing the system.
46 James Duban, “Thoreau, Garrison, and Dymond: Unbending Firmness of Mind,” American
Literature vol. 57, no. 2 (1985), 309“17, 310“11.
47 Thoreau quoted in Duban, “Thoreau, Garrison, and Dymond,” 312.
48 See William H. Herr, “Thoreau: A Civil Disobedient?” Ethics vol. 85, no. 1 (1974), 87“91; and
Daniel Walker Howe, Henry David Thoreau on the Duty of Civil Disobedience: An Inaugural
Lecture delivered before the University of Oxford on 21 may 1990 (Oxford: Clarendon Press,
328 The Political Quakerism of John Dickinson

Quaker Activism in the Twentieth Century
As in the nineteenth century, Quakers and Quaker organizations in the twen-
tieth century were among the seminal actors in the reform movements, most
notably women™s suffrage and civil rights. Yet most of the individuals are
unknown except to scholars in the ¬elds of civil rights or peace studies, or to
activists themselves.
Alice Paul (1885“1977), president of the National American Woman Suf-
frage Association, was the most important woman in the suffrage movement.
The passage of the Nineteenth Amendment was a direct result of her orga-
nization of one of the largest protest campaigns in American history. Under
Paul™s direction, thousands of women calling themselves the “Silent Sentinels”
picketed the White House for eighteen months from January 1917 until June
1919 when the “Susan B. Anthony Amendment” passed both houses. In spite
of the progressive reforms underway in other areas, the political climate was
not friendly to such disruption. With the country at war, to dissent from the
government on any issue was tantamount to treason in the eyes of many. Over
the months, dozens of women were arrested, imprisoned, and some of them
beaten and tortured psychologically. They demanded political prisoner status
to secure humane treatment. Paul herself went on a hunger strike and was force
fed.49 Though her tactics were extremely disruptive, they were submissive, and
never violent or destructive.
Paul™s Quaker credentials are impressive. A descendant of William Penn,
she explained that “I don™t know whether I had any [ancestor] who wasn™t
a Quaker.”50 She was raised by devout Quaker parents in “a little Quaker
village” in New Jersey and attended Quakers schools, including Swarthmore
College, which was “purely Quaker” at this time, and a school for training
Friends in social work in Woodbridge, England.51 As she was growing up, she
said that “I never met anybody who wasn™t a Quaker, and I never heard of
anybody who wasn™t a Quaker.”52 To be a suffragist was a natural (or rather,
a divine) step for Paul. In her community of Friends, the right of women to
vote was taken for granted; this was just one of the “many things in which the
world hadn™t yet come along.”53 She followed early Quaker women™s rights
activists Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton and was a colleague of
Jane Addams, herself raised by a Hicksite father. Paul™s biographer, Christine
A. Lunardini, describes her as “perhaps the single truly charismatic ¬gure in
the twentieth-century suffrage movement” and adds that “Max Weber might
have used Alice Paul as his model in developing the concept of the charismatic

49 Christine A. Lunardini, From Equal Suffrage to Equal Rights: Alice Paul and the National
Women™s Party, 1910“1928 (New York: New York University Press, 1986), 123“49.
50 Conversations with Alice Paul: Woman Suffrage and the Equal Rights Amendment. An inter-
view conducted by Amelia Fry (Regents of the University of California, 1976), 6.
51 Ibid., 5.
52 Ibid., 15.
53 Ibid., 33.
Persistence of Quaker Constitutionalism 329

leader.”54 Her personality and ethic were quintessentially Quaker. She was
a polarizing ¬gure who elicited extreme comments from her followers and
detractors. By some she was considered charitable, patient, well-intentioned,
and conscientious.55 The response of her followers, suggests Lunardini, “can
be understood as a symbol of their search for balance and equality in a world
they perceived to be disorderly.”56 She was, according to her fellow suffragists,
“a genius for organization.”57 On the other hand, she was also perceived to be
abrasive, a “fanatic,” and a “martyr” for the women™s cause.58 Her efforts to
secure women™s rights continued into the 1970s as she fought for the passage
of the Equal Rights Amendment, a measure she helped create.
None would dispute the claim that Martin Luther King, Jr., was the pre-
eminent leader of civil rights reform in the nation™s history. Few, however,
know about his intellectual and spiritual mentors. Because of the disjuncture
between Quaker history and mainstream American history, most scholars have
assumed that King drew his inspiration primarily from Thoreau and Gandhi.
And, to be sure, these men were important teachers for him. Similarly, some
King scholars assume that his drive for reform came from his Baptist tradition.
Reasonable though these assumptions are, they are misguided if taken as the
main source of his thought. For reasons discussed previously, he could not have
gotten a full-¬‚edged theory of civil disobedience from Thoreau. Also, although
King had been exposed to the teachings of Gandhi in college, learning about
them theoretically had not caused him to internalize the ethic and strategy of
nonviolent resistance. Finally, the imperative for social activism was not strong
in the black ministers with whom King associated; they were more concerned
with bringing people to Jesus than effecting change.59 A little-documented fact
is that Quakers were a major impulsion behind the Civil Rights Movement.
Two Friends who were crucial to it were Richard Gregg (1885“1974) and
Bayard Rustin (1912“87). Although they were activists in their own right and
engaged in civil disobedience, they have been overshadowed by their more
famous successor and prot´ g´ .
No doubt Gandhi was a powerful in¬‚uence on King, but this assertion should
be quali¬ed and amended in some important ways. First, it was Gregg who
brought Gandhian philosophy to America. In addition to publishing several
early works with a Quaker press, in 1934 he produced the ¬rst major work in
the United States on Gandhi™s peaceful resistance, The Power of Nonviolence,
with an introduction written by Rufus Jones, a foremost Quaker historian and
theologian. This work enumerates the same principles as those that appeared

54 Lunardini, From Equal Suffrage to Equal Rights, xiv“xv.
55 Ibid., 9.
56 Ibid., xvi.
57 Lucy Berns quoted in ibid., 10.
58 Ibid., 9, 10.
59 John D™Emilio, Lost Prophet: The Life and Times of Bayard Rustin (Chicago: University of
Chicago Press, 2003), 226.
330 The Political Quakerism of John Dickinson

later in An Introduction to the American Friends Service Committee (1962).60
Scholars agree that Gregg™s work “more than any source helped to popularize
Gandhi™s teachings in America.”61 As a group that believes in the universality
of the Light, Quakers were likewise ecumenical in their use of sources to sup-
port their teachings. Gregg™s use of Gandhian principles was hardly a stretch,
considering Gandhi™s own philosophy was shaped in large part by the Sermon
on the Mount.62 In his forward to a 1959 edition of The Power of Nonviolence,
King calls the book “a classic.”63
Second, Gregg did not merely popularize Gandhi; he also added his own
concepts to the theory of nonviolent resistance and made an original contribu-
tion to King™s thinking. In addition to Gandhi™s satyagraha, Gregg put forth
his own interpretation of peaceful resistance, calling it “moral jiu jitsu” “ the
method of knocking one™s opponent off balance with love. This is in the same
tradition as Dymond, who wrote, “He that resists by force, may be overcome
by greater force,” but “nothing can overcome a calm and ¬xed determination
not to obey.”64 Gregg™s aim and his method of disobedience ¬t the mold of
the Quaker bureaucratic libertine of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries;
it centered on Quaker process. “The process,” said Gregg, “is sure and, if the
method is faithfully adhered to, the result is certain.”65 His end, liberty and
unity through peaceful means, was explicit: “War also acts to unify nations
engaged in it. But the unity engendered by non-violent resistance is deeper,
more closely knit and more permanent than that produced by war.”66 Ignoring
even Thoreau, not to mention the centuries of Quakerism before Gregg, one
historian has called him “the ¬rst American to develop a substantial theory of
nonviolent resistance.”67
It is hardly an exaggeration to say that Bayard Rustin was the single most
important in¬‚uence on the thought and practice of King. Rustin was a birthright
Quaker, attended a Quaker-founded school for black children, and was a
member of a meeting in Manhattan. His biographer John D™Emilio writes that

60 Judith Hicks Stiehm, “Contemporary Theories of Nonviolent Resistance” (Ph.D. Diss.,
Columbia University, 1969), 64.
61 Maurice Isserman, If I Had a Hammer, 132. See also Richard G. Fox, “Passage from India,”
in R. Fox and O. Starn, eds., Between Resistance and Revolution: Cultural Politics and Social
Protest (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1997), 65“82.
62 V. V. Ramana Murti, “In¬‚uence of the Western Tradition on Gandhian Doctrine,” Philosophy
East and West vol. 18, no. 1/2 (1968), 55“65; A. L. Herman, “Satyagraha: A New Indian Word
for Some Old Ways of Western Thinking,” Philosophy East and West vol. 19, no. 2 (1968),
63 Martin Luther King, Jr., Forward to The Power of Nonviolence, Richard Gregg (Nyack, NY:
Fellowship Publications, 1959).
64 Dymond, Essays on the Principles of Morality, 110.
65 Richard Gregg, The Power of Nonviolence (Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Company, 1934), 108.
66 Ibid.
67 Joseph Kip Kosek, “Richard Gregg, Mohandas Gandhi, and the Strategy of Nonviolent Resis-
tance,” The Journal of American History vol. 91, no. 4 (2005), 1318“48, 1318.
Persistence of Quaker Constitutionalism 331

Rustin left a profound mark “ on the unfolding of the Montgomery bus boycott as a
national story, on the evolution of King™s role as a national leader, on the particular
association of nonviolence with Montgomery and King. Rustin was as responsible as
anyone else for the insinuation of nonviolence into the very heart of what became the
most powerful social movement in twentieth-century America.68

Like Gregg, Rustin drew on Gandhi. He also looked to Marx for his inspi-
ration, and Gregg™s The Power of Nonviolence was an “essential primer” for
him.69 Like other Quaker activists, the tradition in which he was raised pro-
vided the foundation for his principles, and he passed it self-consciously on to
King. D™Emilio explains that “the Quaker in¬‚ection to his faith, with its paci-
¬st tradition and nonconforming stance, made social activism his gospel.”70
Rustin handed these traditional principles down to King: universality of the
Light, peaceful process, and activism. It would not be dif¬cult to convince a
Baptist minister that “the spark of God is in each of us”; by this time, Quak-
ers were hardly the only people to reject predestination or retain hope for the
regeneration of man.71 But the other principles were not native to King™s tra-
dition, nor had he acquired them by 1955 when he met Rustin. He was not a
paci¬st. In fact, when Rustin visited King™s home for the ¬rst time, there were
guns lying about the house. Nor was he an activist.72 For Quakers, of course,
paci¬sm and activism were intimately connected.
In the ¬rst place, Rustin said in his schooling of King, “We cannot remain
honest unless we are opposed to injustice wherever it occurs.”73 This meant
that there was an imperative to enter the public sphere to challenge the dom-
inant culture. But it also meant that they must do so in a way that would
convince, not coerce. “We paci¬sts urge nonviolence,” he said, “because if
change toward justice is to take place, it must be in an atmosphere where cre-
ative con¬‚ict and debate are possible.”74 In an assertion of Quaker process,
he wrote, “We paci¬sts maintain that the law of ends and means does, in fact
operate.”75 As an indication of the nonexplicit way “ by example as opposed
to overt instruction “ in which Quakers generally transmit their tradition, it is
interesting to see that Rustin had to study Quaker process and apply the tradi-
tional principles himself to learn through experience. He learned that peaceful

68 D™Emilio, Lost Prophet, 237. The reason Rustin™s name is not more closely associated with
King™s would seem to be because of the former™s homosexuality. As D™Emilio explains it, Rustin
was reticent about being too public a ¬gure for this reason (237), and, for a period he and King
became estranged as an opponent of King™s threatened to levy charges against him of a sexual
affair with Rustin (298). On Rustin, see also Jervis Anderson, Bayard Rustin: The Troubles I™ve
Seen: A Biography (New York: Harper-Collins, 1997).
69 Ibid., 52.
70 Ibid., 236.
71 Rustin in ibid., 459.
72 Ibid., 230.
73 Rustin in ibid., 459.
74 Bayard Rustin, “Nonviolence on Trial,” in Staughton Lynd, ed., Nonviolence in America: A
Documentary History (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1966), 496.
75 Ibid., 495.
332 The Political Quakerism of John Dickinson

dissent is not easy, and neither is balancing dissent and unity, while still mak-
ing progress toward the Truth. “As a Quaker,” he explained, “I started out
by saying that I thought we had to make all decisions by consensus.” But he
eventually realized that “[c]onsensus does not mean that everybody agrees. It
means that the person who disagrees must disagree so vigorously that he is
prepared to ¬ght with everybody else.”76 Of course, we must understand that
“to ¬ght” in this context means “creative con¬‚ict” or “positive confrontation”
rather than hostility. Robert Barclay wrote that it is “unlawful to do Evil, that
Good may come of it . . . it is far better to suffer Loss.”77 King again echoed
this fundamental Quaker process. “Constructive ends,” he said, “can never
give absolute moral justi¬cation to destructive means, because in the ¬nal anal-
ysis the end is pre¨ xistent in the mean.”78 Moreover, he recognized the same
imperative for balance between the individual and community that Quakers
had struggled with in their process for centuries. He wrote, “The Kingdom of
God is neither the thesis of individual enterprise not the antithesis of collective
enterprise, but a synthesis which reconciles the truths of both.”79
This “creative con¬‚ict” is the way in which Rustin counseled King toward
activism. For Quakers, looking for “God™s spark” inside and then peacefully,
but ¬rmly disagreeing with those who would sanction injustice was a duty.
Jonathan Dymond explained that “the business of man is to act as the Christian
citizen “ not merely to prepare himself for another world, but to do such good
as he may, political as well as social, in the present.”80 Rustin believed that this
was what he bequeathed to King. Rather than saving souls for the next world,
Rustin taught him “to save souls in this life by making it simpler for people to
be good.” He gave him “a socialist education” and taught him the importance
of modeling the process.81
Not just his teachings, but Rustin himself launched King into the public
sphere. He was not only the inspiration behind much of King™s work, but, at
¬rst, he was actually King™s voice. The ¬rst publication under King™s name was
Rustin™s work “ “Our Struggle,” published in 1956 in Liberation.82 Re¬‚ecting
on King™s relationship with Rustin, one contemporary asked: “How would it
have been possible for King not to have become a prot´ g´ of Bayard? Not how
did he, but how could he not have been?”
We need not hunt through King™s papers or his more obscure publications
to ¬nd only a smattering of statements that prove Quaker in¬‚uence. He wrote
it all in one place as he sat in a jail cell in Birmingham. He presented himself
as one of the primitive Christian apostles who roamed the land proclaiming

76 Rustin quoted in D™Emilio, Lost Prophet, 342.
77 Barclay, Anarchy, 41.
78 Martin Luther King, Jr., “Pilgrimage to Nonviolence,” in Nonviolence in America, 211.
79 Ibid., 213.
80 Dymond, Essays on the Principles of Morality, 326.
81 D™Emilio, Lost Prophet, 238, 231.
82 Ibid., 239.
83 David McReynolds quoted in D™Emilio, Lost Prophet, 236.
Persistence of Quaker Constitutionalism 333

the “gospel of freedom.”84 He described the process, the steps, one must take
to bring one™s case before the people: “(1) collection of the facts to determine
whether injustices are alive; (2) negotiation; (3) self-puri¬cation; and (4) direct
action.” Their “very bodies” would be presented “as a means of laying our case
before the conscience of the local and the national community.”85 Recognizing
the performative aspect of this sort of protest, he explained that the disobe-
dience “seeks to dramatize the issue.” The resulting “constructive, nonviolent
tension,” he continued, “is necessary for growth” within the community.86 He
addressed the usual misconception by outsiders that had attended all Quaker
civil disobedience “ that this behavior was a sort of antinomianism, a rejection
of civil law in favor of some internal, private law. “At ¬rst glance,” he acknowl-
edged, “it may seem rather paradoxical for us consciously to break laws.” He
explained to his readers how to distinguish between just and unjust laws.87 Fol-
lowing Barclay, who assured King Charles II of his ¬delity to the government,
he continued, “In no sense do I advocate evading or defying the law” clandes-
tinely. “That would lead to anarchy. One who breaks an unjust law must do
so openly, lovingly . . . and with a willingness to accept the penalty. I submit
that an individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust and who
willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience
of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect
for law.”88
The American Friends Service Committee found this letter to be “an eloquent
statement of the nonviolent approach to the restructuring of our social order”
and linked it with early Quakers, who were “led by conscience to practice
civil disobedience as a witness to the supremacy of God™s commands over
the dictates of men.”89 The Society of Friends could not have written a better
statement of their traditional theologico-political philosophy themselves. Thus,
in May of 1963, Quakers once again became the “First Publishers of Truth”
when they released the ¬rst 50,000 copies of King™s letter to the world.90
84 Martin Luther King, Jr., Letter from a Birmingham City Jail, 3
85 Ibid., 4.
86 Ibid., 5.
87 Ibid., 6“7.
88 Ibid., 7
89 Colin W. Bell, preface to ibid.
90 S. Jonathan Bass, Blessed Are the Peacemakers: Martin Luther King, Jr., Eight White Religious
Leaders, and the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University
Press, 2001), 141.

Primary Sources”Manuscripts

American Philosophical Society
John Harvey Powell Papers.

Delaware Public Archives
Small Manuscript Collection, John Dickinson Letters.

Friends Historical Library, Swarthmore (PA) College
John Alston Papers, 1797“1847.
Elizabeth Ashbridge. “Some Account of the forepart of the life of Elizabeth Ashbridge,”
Association of Friends for the Free Instruction of Adult Colored Persons, 1795“1905.
Bringhurst Papers, 1732“1819. (transcribed)
Journal of Joshua Brown, 1717“98.
Journal of Margaret Ellis, 1752.
Journal of Joshua Evans, 1731“98.
Journal of Benjamin Ferris, 1740“71.
Fisher Warner Family Papers, Miers Fisher, 1748“1819.
Journal of John Kinsey, 1693“1750.
Lindley Murray Papers, 1785“1830.
Journal of Ann Moore,1756“62 (transcribed).
Mary Pennington, A Brief Account of some of my exercises from my Childhood, 1680.
Philadelphia Yearly Meeting, Minutes,1682“1746, 1747“79.
, Miscellaneous papers, 1662“1790.
, Meeting for Suffering, Minutes, miscellaneous papers, 1755“1800.
Journal of Charles Williams, 1785“87.
Miscellaneous Letters, Richardson Manuscripts, 1773“1862.

336 Bibliography

Historical Society of Pennsylvania
American Society for Promoting Useful Knowledge, 1790.
Cox-Parrish-Wharton Papers, 1600“1900.
John Dickinson, Commonplace Book.
Logan Family Papers, 1664“1871.
Maria Dickinson Logan Collection, 1671“1890.
R. R. Logan Collection, 1671“1882.
Isaac Norris Letterbook, 1719“56.
Norris Family Papers, 1742“1860.
Pemberton Papers, Letters.
Diaries of John Pemberton, 1777“81.
William Penn Papers, Domestic and Miscellaneous Letters, 1654“1735.
Richard Peters Letterbook, 1739“43.
Peter Stephen Du Ponceau Papers, 1760“1864.
Philadelphia Society for Alleviating the Miseries of Public Prisons, 1787“1793.

Library Company of Philadelphia
John Dickinson Papers.
Powell, J. H., Finding Aid for John Dickinson Papers.

Library of Congress
Public Records Of¬ce Transcripts, Treasury Papers.

Quaker Collection, Haverford (PA) College
Allinson Family Papers, 1698“1939.
American Friends Letters, c. 1676“1986.
Associated Executive Committee of Friends on Indian Affairs, 1758“1929.
Journal of George Churchman, 1759“1813.
Dictionary of Quaker Biography
Henry Drinker Correspondence, 1777“1778.
Thomas Pym Cope Collection, 1768“1854.
Female Society for the Relief of the Distressed and Employment of the Poor, 1795“
Pemberton Papers, 1741“89.
Philadelphia Yearly Meeting, Books of Discipline,1689, 1704, 1719, 1761, 1797, 1806,
, Minutes, 1739“41.
Henry Simmons, Jr., Papers, 1796“1800.
Journal of Ann Cooper Whitall, 1716“97.
Roberts Autograph Collection.
Nicholas Waln Family Papers, 1742“1813.

Primary Sources”Published
Adams, John. Twenty-Six Letters, upon Interesting Subjects, Respecting the Revolution
of America. New York, 1780.
Bibliography 337

. The Works of John Adams, Second President of the United States: with a Life
of the Author, Notes and Illustrations. Charles Francis Adams, ed. Boston: Little,
Brown and Co., 1856.
The Address of some of the Peaceable and Well Affected Freeholders and Inhabitants
of the Town and County of Philadelphia. Philadelphia, 1693.
An Address to the Rev. Alison, the Rev. Mr. Ewing, and others, Trustees of the Corpo-
ration for the Relief of Presbyterian Ministers, their Widows and Children: Being a
Vindication of the Quakers from the Aspersions of the said Trustees in their Letter
published in the London Chronicle, No. 1223. By a Lover of Truth, Philadelphia,
An Answer to an Invidious Pamphlet, intituled, A Brief State. . . . London, 1755.
Armstrong, Edward, ed. Correspondence between William Penn and James Logan,
Secretary of the Province and Others. 2 vols. Philadelphia: The Historical Society of
Pennsylvania, 1870“72.
Barclay, Robert. The Anarchy of the Ranters and other Libertines. London, 1676.
. An Apology for the True Christian Divinity [1675]. New York, 1827.
Basler, Roy P., ed. The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln, New Brunswick, NJ:
Rutgers University Press, 1953.
Bellers, John. Essays about the poor, manufactures, trade, plantations, & immorality.
London, 1699.
Benezet, Anthony. Memoirs of the Life of Anthony Benezet. Roberts Vaux, ed. Philadel-
phia, 1817.
Besse, Joseph. A Collection of Sufferings of the People Called Quakers for the Testimony
of a Good Conscience. London, 1753.
Bishop, George. The Burden of Babylon and the Triumph of Zion as it was seen in the
Valley of Vision. London, 1661.
Boyd, Julian P., Barbara B. Oberg, et al., eds. The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, 34 vols. +
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1950.
Brissot de Warville, Jean-Paul. A Critical Examination of the Marquis de Chatellux™s
Travels in North America in a Letter Addressed to the Marquis; principally intended
as a Refutation of his Opinions Concerning the Quakers, the Negroes, the People,
and Mankind. Philadelphia, 1788.
Bugg, Francis. Hidden Things brought to Light. Whereby The Fox is Unkennel™d: And
the Bowells of Quakerism Ript up, laid open, and expos™d to Publick View; by a
Dialogue Tripartite. Whereby the Quakers Inside (to speak Figuratively) is turn™d
Outward; and the Great Mystery of the Little Whore Farther Unfolded. London,
. The Pilgrim™s Progress from Quakerism to Christianity. London, 1698.
. Quakerism Anatomized, and Finally Dissected: Shewing, from Plain Fact, that
a Rigid Quaker is a Cruel Persecutor. London, 1709.
. A Retrospective-Glass for the Quakers, (1710) republished in A Finishing
Stroke: Or, Some Gleanings, Collected out of the Quakers Books . . . Whereby The
Great Mystery of the Little Whore is farther Unfolded. London, 1712.
Burnaby, Andrew. Travels Through the Middle Settlements in North-America in the
years 1759 and 1760 with Observations upon the State of the Colonies. Ithaca, NY:
Cornell University Press, 1963.
Burrough, Edward. A Message for Instruction to all the Rulers, Judges, and Magis-
trates . . . London, 1658.
Butter¬eld, L. H., ed. Diary and Autobiography of John Adams. Cambridge, MA:
Belknap Press, Harvard University, 1961.
338 Bibliography

, ed. The Letters of Benjamin Rush. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press,
Byllynge, Edward. A Mite of Affection. London, 1659.
. A Word of Reproof, and Advice. London, 1659.
Chew, Samuel. The Speech of Samuel Chew, Esq. Chief Judge of the Counties of
Newcastle, Kent, and Sussex on Delaware. On the Lawfulness of Defence against
an Armed Enemy. Delivered from the Bench to the Grand Jury of the County of
Newcastle, Nov. 21. 1741. Philadelphia, 1775.
Churchman, John. An Account of the Gospel Labours and Christian Experiences of a
Faithful Minister of Christ. Philadelphia, 1779.
Clarkson, Thomas. A Portraiture of Quakerism. Taken from a view of the Education
and Discipline, Social Manners, Civil and Political Economy, Religious Principles
and Character of the Society of Friends. 3 vols. New York, 1806.
Cockson, Edward. Rigid Quaker, Cruel Persecutor. London, 1705.
Conference Between a Parish-Priest and a Quaker; Published for the preventing
(if possible) the vile deceits of priestcraft in America. Philadelphia, 1725.
Conversations with Alice Paul: Woman Suffrage and the Equal Rights Amendment. An
interview conducted by Amelia Fry. Regents of the University of California, 1976.
Conway, Moncure Daniel, ed. The Writings of Thomas Paine. New York: G. P. Putnam
and Sons, 1896.
Cr` vec“ur, J. Hector St. John de. Letters from an American Farmer. New York: Oxford
University Press, 1997.
G. D., of the Inner-Temple. The Quaker No Occasional Conformist, but a Sincere
Christian in his Life. London, 1703.
Dickinson, John. An Address to the Committee of Correspondence in Barbados.
Philadelphia, 1766.
. “Friends and Countrymen” [Address on the Stamp Act]. Philadelphia, 1765.
. An Essay of a Frame of Government for Pennsylvania. Philadelphia, 1776.
. An Essay on the Constitutional Power of Great-Britain over the Colonies in
America. Philadelphia, 1774.
. Late Regulations Respecting the British Colonies on the Continent of America
Considered. Philadelphia, 1765.
. A Reply to a piece called The speech of Joseph Galloway, Esquire. Philadelphia,
. A Speech Delivered in the House of Assembly of the Province of Pennsylvania.
Philadelphia, 1764.
. Letters from a Farmer in Pennsylvania, To the Inhabitants of the British
Colonies (Boston, 1768) in Empire and Nation, 2nd ed. Forrest McDonald, ed.
Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1999.
. The Letters of Fabius in 1788 on the Federal Constitution. facsimile rpt. Kila,
MT: Kessinger Publishing, 2004.
. “Notes for a Speech (III),” in James H. Hutson, ed. Supplement to Max
Farrand™s The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787. New Haven, 1987;
Dickinson, John, and Thomas Jefferson. A Declaration by the Representatives of the
United Colonies of North-America, Now Met in Congress at Philadelphia, Setting
Forth the Causes and Necessity of Their Taking Up Arms. Philadelphia, 1775.
diGiacomantonio, William Charles, et al., eds. Documentary History of the First Fed-
eral Congress of the United States of America, vol. XIV: Debates in the House of
Bibliography 339

Representatives, Third Session: December 1790“March 1791. Baltimore: The Johns
Hopkins University Press, 1995.
Dulaney, Daniel. Considerations on the Propriety of Imposing Taxes on the British
Colonies. New York, 1765.
Dunn, Richard S., and Mary Maples Dunn, eds. The Papers of William Penn. 5 vols.
Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1981“87.
Dymond, Jonathan. Essays on the Principles of Morality and on the Private and Political
Rights and Obligations of Mankind. New York, 1845.
Ellwood, Thomas. A discourse concerning riots: occasioned by some of the people called
Quakers, being imprisoned and indicted for a riot, for only being at a peaceable
meeting to worship God. London, 1683.
. The History of the Life of Thomas Ellwood. London, 1714.
Evans, William, and Thomas Evans, eds. The Friends™ Library: comprises journals,
doctrinal treatises, and other writings of the Religious Society of Friends. 16 vols.
Philadelphia, 1837“50.
Faldo, John. Quakerism no Christianity: Or, a Thorow Quaker no Christian proved by
the Quakers Principles, detected out of their chief Writers . . . with . . . an Account of
their Foundation laid in Popery. London, 1675.
Farrand, Max, ed. The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787. 3 vols. New Haven,
CT: Yale University Press, 1937.
Force, Peter, ed. American Archives, ser. 4. 9 vols. Washington, DC, 1837“53.
Ford, Paul Leicester, ed. The Writings of Thomas Jefferson. 10 vols. New York: G.P.
Putnam, 1892“99.
Fox, George. A Declaration from the Harmles & Innocent People of GOD called
Quakers. Against all Plotters and Fighters in the World. London, 1660.
. A Few Plain Words to be considered by those of the Army, or others that would
have a parliament that is chosen by the voices of the people, to govern three nations.
Wherein is shewn unto them according to the Scripture of Truth, that a parliament
so chosen are not likely to govern for God and the good of his people. London, 1660.
Gilpin, Thomas. Exiles in Virginia: With Observations on the Conduct of the Society
of Friends During the Revolutionary War Comprising the Of¬cial Papers of the
Government Relating to that Period. 1777“1778. (1848). facsimile rpt. Bowie, MD:
Heritage Books, 2002.
Graydon, Alexander. Memoirs of a Life Chie¬‚y Passed in Pennsylvania within the Last
Sixty Years. Harrisburg, PA, 1811.
Greene, Dana, ed. Lucretia Mott: Her Complete Sermons and Speeches. New York:
Edwin Mellen Press, 1980.
Gregg, Richard. The Power of Nonviolence. Introduction by Rufus Jones. Philadelphia:
J. B. Lippincott Company, 1934.
Hallowell, Anna Davis, ed. James and Lucretia Mott: Life and Letters. Boston:
Houghton Mif¬‚in and Co., 1884.
Heinrichs, Johann. “Extracts form the Letter-Book of Captain Johann Heinrichs of the
Hessian Jager Corps, 1778“1780,” PMHB vol. 22, no. 2 (1898): 137“70.
Hunt, Isaac. A Looking-Glass for Presbyterians. Or A brief examination of their loyalty,
merit, and other quali¬cations for government. With some animadversions on the
Quaker unmask™d. Humbly addres™d to the consideration of the loyal freemen of
Pennsylvania. Philadelphia, 1764.
Hutson, James H. comp. and ed. A Decent Respect to the Opinions of Mankind: Con-
gressional State Papers, 1774“1776. Washington, DC: Library of Congress, 1976.
340 Bibliography

, ed. Supplement to Max Farrand™s The Records of the Federal Convention of
1787. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1987.
Janney, Samuel Macpherson. Memoirs of Samuel M. Janney. Philadelphia: Friends™
Book Association, 1881.
Jennings, Samuel. Truth Rescued from Falsehood, being and answer to a Late Scurrilous
Piece Entituled. The Case Put and Decided . . . London, 1699.
Kaminski, John, and Gaspare J. Saldino, et al., eds. The Documentary History of the
Rati¬cation of the Constitution, vols. 14, 16, 17. Commentaries on the Constitution:
Public and Private. Madison: State Historical Society of Wisconsin, 1983, 1986,
Keith, George. An Appeal from the Twenty Eight Judges to the Spirit of Truth & True
Judgment in all Faithful Friends, called Quakers. Philadelphia, 1692.
. The plea of the innocent against the false judgment of the guilty. . . .
Philadelphia, 1692.
King, Martin Luther, Jr. Letter from a Birmingham City Jail. Philadelphia: American
Friends Service Committee, 1963.
. Forward to The Power of Nonviolence, by Richard Gregg. Nyack, NY: Fellow-
ship Publications, 1959.
Lay, Benjamin. All Slave-Keepers That Keep the Innocent in Bondage, Apostates Pre-
tending to lay Claim to the Pure & Holy Christian Religion. Philadelphia, 1738.
Lewis, W. S., et al., eds. Horace Walpole™s Correspondence. New Haven, CT: Yale
University Press, 1971.
The Liberties of the Massachusetts Collonie in New England [1641]. Old South Lea¬‚ets.
Boston: Directors of the Old South Work, 1896-1900s, 7: 261“267.
Lloyd, David. A Defence of the Legislative Constitution of the Province of Pennsylvania
as it now stands Con¬rmed and Established, by Law and Charter. Philadelphia,
Locke, John. A Letter Concerning Toleration. London, 1689.
. On the Reasonableness of Christianity. London, 1695.
. The Second Treatise of Government in The Selected Writings of John Locke,
Paul E. Sigmund, ed. New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 2005.
. Two Tracts of Government. London, 1660“c.1662.
Logan, James. The Antidote to A Vindication of the Legislative Power. Philadelphia,
MacKinney, Gertrude, ed. Pennsylvania Archives, Eighth Series: Votes and Proceedings
of the House of Representatives of the Province of Pennsylvania. 8 vols. Philadelphia:
Franklin and Hall, 1931“35.
Minutes of the Provincial Council of the Province of Pennsylvania from the Organiza-
tion to the Termination of the Proprietary Government. Vols. 1“4. Philadelphia: Jo.
Severn, 1852.
Mitchell, James T., and Henry Flanders, eds. Statutes-at-Large of Pennsylvania from
1682“1801. 15 vols. Harrisburg, PA: Clarence M. Busch, State Printer of Pennsylva-
nia, 1896“1911.
Moulton, Phillips P., ed. The Journal and Major Essays of John Woolman. Richmond,
IN: Friends United Press, 1989.
“New York and Philadelphia in 1787,” PMHB vol. 12, no. 1, (1888): 97“115.
Otis, James. Rights of the British Colonies Asserted and Proved. Boston, 1764.
Paine, Thomas. Common Sense. Philadelphia, 1776.
Bibliography 341

Pearson, John. Anti-Christian Treachery Discover™d and Its Way Block™d Up. . . .
London, 1686.
Penington, Isaac. “A Brief Account of What the People Called Quakers Desire in Ref-
erence to Civil Government” (1661) in Penington™s Works. London, 1680.
. Concerning Persecution. . . . London, 1661.
. A Considerable Question About Government. London, 1653.
. The Consideration of a Position Concerning the Book of Prayer. . . . London,
. The Fundamental Right, Safety and Liberty of the People. London, 1651.
. Three Queries Propounded to the King and Parliament. London, 1662.
. The Way of Life and Death Made Manifest, and Set Before Men. London,
Penn, William. The Continued Cry of the Oppressed for Justice. . . . London, 1675.
. A Discourse of the General Rule of Faith and Practice. London, 1699.
. England™s Great Interest in the Choice of this New Parliament. London,
. England™s Present Interest Discovered. London, 1675.
. An Essay Towards the Present and Future Peace of Europe. London, 1693.
. The Great Case of Liberty of Conscience. London, 1670.
. To James Logan. [Notes and Queries.] PMHB vol. 7 (1883): 228“36.
. No Cross, No Crown. London, 1669.
. One Project for the Good of England: That is, Our Civil Union is Our Civil
Safety. London, 1679.
. A Persuasive to Moderation. London, 1686.
. Some Fruits of Solitude. London, 1693; rpt. Richmond, IN: Friends United
Press, 1978.
The Pennsylvania Chronicle; and Universal Advertiser. Philadelphia, 1767“74.
The Pennsylvania Gazette. Philadelphia, 1728“89.
Pennsylvania Journal, and the Weekly Advertiser. Philadelphia, 1766“77.
The Peoples Ancient and Just Liberties Asserted in the Tryal of William Penn, and
William Mead. London, 1670.
The Proceedings Relative to Calling the Convention of 1776 and 1790. Harrisburg, PA,
Quaker Tracts. 9 vols. London, 1658“76.
Ramsay, David. The History of the American Revolution. 2 vols. Philadelphia,
Red Hot Chili Peppers (Michael Balzary, John Fruscianti, Anthony Kiedis, Chad Smith).
Stadium Arcadium 2 CDs. Burbank, CA: Warner Bros. Records, Inc., 2006.
The Religious Society of Friends. The Address of the People call™d Quakers, In the
Province of Pennsylvania, To John Penn, Esquire, Lieutenant Governor of the said
Province, &c. Philadelphia, 1764.
. The Ancient Testimony and Principles of the People Called Quakers; Renewed,
with Respect to the King and Government; Touching the Commotions now prevailing
in these and other Parts of America, addressed to the People in General. Philadelphia,
. An Epistle of Caution and Advice, &c. Philadelphia, 1754.
. An Epistle . . . To Our Friends and Brethren in Religious Profession, in These
and the Adjacent Provinces. Philadelphia, 1776.
342 Bibliography

. Faith and Practice: A Book of Christian Discipline. Philadelphia: Philadelphia
Yearly Meeting, 1997.
. A Representation on Behalf of the People called Quakers, to the President and
Executive Council, and the General Assembly of Pennsylvania, &c. Reasons why
Friends do not illuminate their Houses at the Time of public rejoicing, nor shut their
Shops for the public Fasts, Feasts and Thanksgivings. Dublin, 1782.
. The Testimony of the People called Quakers, given forth by a Meeting of the
Representatives of said People, in Pennsylvania and New-Jersey, held at Philadelphia
the twenty-fourth Day of the ¬rst Month. Philadelphia, 1775.
. To Our Fellow Citizens of the United States of North America and others
whom it may concern. Philadelphia, 1799.
. To the General Assembly of Pennsylvania. The Representation of a Number of
the Citizens of Philadelphia, Members of the Religious Society of the People called
Quakers. Philadelphia, 1784.
Roberts, Kenneth, and Anna M. Roberts, trans. and eds. Moreau de St. M´ ry™s American
Journey, 1793“98, Garden City, NJ: Doubleday, 1947.
Rogers, William. The Christian-Quaker, Distinguished from the Apostate & Innovator.
London, 1680.
Savile, George, Marquis of Halifax. The Character of a Trimmer. London,
Scott, Job. Journal of the Life, Travels, and Gospel Labours of that Faithful Servant
and Minister of Christ, Job Scott. London, 1815.
Smith, Paul Hubert, ed. Letters from the Delegates to Congress, 1774“1789. 25 vols.
Summer¬eld, FL: Historical Database, 1995.
Smith, William. A Brief State of the Province of Pennsylvania . . . In a Letter from a
Gentleman who has resided many Years in Pennsylvania to his Friend in London.
London, 1755.
. A Brief View of the Conduct of Pennsylvania. Philadelphia, 1755.
Soderlund, Jean R. ed. William Penn and the Founding of Pennsylvania, 1680“
1684: A Documentary History. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press,
Sparks, Jared, ed. The Writings of George Washington. 2 vols. Boston, 1838.
Still´ Charles J. and Paul Leicester Ford, eds., The Life and Writings of John Dickinson.
2 vols. Volume 1: The Life and Times of John Dickinson, 1732 “1808, Charles J.
Still´ , ed.; Volume 2: The Writings of John Dickinson: Volume 1: The Political Writ-
ings, Paul Leicester Ford, ed. Philadelphia: The Historical Society of Pennsylvania,
Syrett, Harold C., et al., eds. The Papers of Alexander Hamilton. 27 vols. New York:
Colombia University Press, 1961“87.
Tatham, John, Thomas Revell, and Nathaniel Westland. The Case Put and Decided by
George Fox, George Whitehead, Stephen Crisp, and other [of] the most Ancient &
Eminent Quakers, between Edward Billing on the One Part, and some West-Jersians,
headed by Samuell Jennings on the other Part. . . . London, 1699.
Tocqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America. J. P. Mayer, ed. New York: Harper-
Perennial, 1988.
Trimmer, Tim. Now in the Press, and will be speedily published, The Life and Adven-
tures of a Certain Quaker Presbyterian Indian Colonel. To which will be added,
The Quali¬cations necessary to entitle a Man to the digni¬ed Name of a “modern
moderate Quaker.™” Philadelphia, 1766.
Bibliography 343

Turnbull, Robert. A Visit to the Philadelphia Prison; Being an accurate and particu-
lar account of the wise and humane administration adopted in every part of that
building. . . . Philadelphia, 1796.
Voltaire, Francis de. Letters Concerning the English Nation. London, 1733.
Warville, Jean-Paul Brissot de. A Critical Examination of the Marquis de Chatellux™s
Travels in North America in a Letter Addressed to the Marquis; principally intended
as a Refutation of his Opinions Concerning the Quakers, the Negroes, the People,
and Mankind. Philadelphia, 1788.
Williamson, Hugh. The Plain Dealer: Or, a Few Remarks upon Quaker-Politicks, and
their Attempts to Change the Government of Pennsylvania. With some Observa-
tions on the false and abusive Papers which they have lately published. No. 1 & 3.
Philadelphia, 1764.
Winstanley, Gerard. The Law of Freedom and other writings. Christopher Hill, ed.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.

Secondary Sources”Books
Adams, Willi Paul. The First American Constitutions: Republican Ideology and the
Making of State Constitutions in Revolutionary America. Chapel Hill: University of
North Carolina Press, 1979.
Ahlstrom, Sydney E. A Religious History of the American People. New Haven, CT:
Yale University Press, 1972.
Aldridge, Alfred Owen. Franklin and His Contemporaries. New York: New York Uni-
versity Press, 1957.
Alexander, Howard Wright. George Fox and the Early Quakers. Richmond, IN: Friends
United Press, 1986.
Allen, Barbara. Tocqueville, Covenant, and the Democratic Revolution: Harmoniz-
ing Earth with Heaven. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books of Rowman & Little¬eld
Publishers, 2005.
Allen, Devere, ed., Paci¬sm in the Modern World. New York: Garland Publishing,
Anderson, Fred, and Andrew Cayton. The Dominion of War: Empire and Liberty in
North America, 1500“2000. New York: Viking, 2005.
Anderson, Jervis. Bayard Rustin: The Troubles I™ve Seen: A Biography, New York:
Harper-Collins, 1997.
Arnold, Douglas. A Republican Revolution: Ideology and Politics in Pennsylvania,
1776“1790. New York: Garland Publishing, 1989.
Ashcraft, Richard. Revolutionary Politics and Locke™s ˜Two Treatises of Government.™
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986.
Austin, J. L. How To Do Things with Words, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Harvard University
Press, 1975.
Austin, James T. Life of Elbridge Gerry. 2 vols. Boston, 1828“29; rpt. New York: Da
Capo, 1970.
Bacon, Margaret Hope. Valiant Friend: The Life of Lucretia Mott. New York: Walker
and Company, 1980.
Bailyn, Bernard. The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution. Cambridge, MA:
Belknap Press, Harvard University, 1967.
, ed. Pamphlets of the American Revolution, 1750“1776. Vol. 1. Cambridge,
MA: Belknap Press, Harvard University, 1965.
344 Bibliography

Baltzell, E. Digby. Puritan Boston and Quaker Philadelphia: Two Protestant Ethics and
the Spirit of Class Authority and Leadership. New York: The Free Press, 1979.
Bancroft, George. History of the United States from the Discovery of the Continent.
New York: D. Appleton and Co. 1912.
Banning, Lance. The Jeffersonian Persuasion: Evolution of a Party Ideology. Ithaca,
NY: Cornell University Press, 1978.
Barbour, Hugh. The Quakers in Puritan England. New Haven, CT: Yale University
Press, 1964.
Barbour, Hugh, and J. William Frost. The Quakers. New York: Greenwood Press, 1988.
Barnes, Harry Elmer. The Evolution of Penology in Pennsylvania. Indianapolis: Bobbs-
Merrill, 1927.
Barton, David. Original Intent: The Courts, the Constitution and Religion. Aledo, TX:
WallBuilder Press, 2004.
Bass, S. Jonathan. Blessed Are the Peacemakers: Martin Luther King, Jr., Eight White
Religious Leaders, and the “Letter from a Birmingham Jail.” Baton Rouge: Louisiana
State University Press, 2001.
Bauman, Richard. Let Your Words Be Few: Symbolism of Speaking and Silence among
Seventeenth-Century Quakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
. For the Reputation of Truth: Politics, Religion, and Con¬‚ict among the Penn-
sylvania Quakers, 1750“1800. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1971.
Baylor, Michael C. Action and Person: Conscience in Late Scholasticism and the Young
Luther. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1977.
Beatty, Edwin Corbyn Obert. William Penn as Social Philosopher. New York: Columbia
University Press, 1939.
Becker, Carl. History of Political Parties in the Province of New York. Madison: Uni-
versity of Wisconsin Press, 1909.
Bedau, Hugo Adam. Civil Disobedience in Focus. New York: Routledge, 1991.
, ed. Civil Disobedience: Theory and Practice. New York: Pegasus, 1969.
Beeman, R. Richard. The Varieties of Political Experience in Eighteenth-Century Amer-
ica. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2005.
Beer, Samuel H. To Make a Nation: The Rediscovery of American Federalism. Cam-
bridge, MA: Belknap Press, Harvard University, 1993.
Bloch, Maurice, ed. Political Language and Oratory in Traditional Society. New York:
Academic Press, 1975.
Bonomi, Patricia U. Under the Cope of Heaven: Religion, Society, and Politics in Colo-
nial America. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.
Boorstin, Daniel. The Americans: The Colonial Experience. New York: Vintage Books,
Bouton, Terry. Taming Democracy: “The People,” the Founders, and the Troubled
Ending of the American Revolution. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Boyd, Julian P. Anglo-American Union: Joseph Galloway™s Plans to Preserve the British
Empire, 1774“1788. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1941.
Bradford, M. E. Founding Fathers: Brief Lives of the Framers of the United States
Constitution. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 1994.
Braithwaite, W. C. The Beginnings of Quakerism. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 1955.
. The Second Period of Quakerism. London: Macmillan and Co., 1919.
Bridenbaugh, Carl, and Jessica Bridenbaugh. Rebels and Gentlemen: Philadelphia in
the Age of Franklin. New York: Oxford University Press, 1962.
Bibliography 345

Brinton, Howard, H., ed. Children of Light, in Honor of Rufus Jones. New York:
Macmillan, 1938.
. Friends for 300 Years: History and Beliefs of the Society of Friends Since George
Fox Started the Movement. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1952.
. Quaker Education in Theory and Practice. Wallingford, PA: Pendle Hill, 1940.
. Quaker Journals: Varieties of Religious Experience among Friends. Walling-
ford, PA: Pendle Hill, 1972.
. The Religious Philosophy of Quakerism: The Beliefs of Fox, Barclay, and Penn
as Based on the Gospel of John. Wallingford, PA: Pendle Hill, 1973.
Brinton, Anna Cox. Then and Now: Quaker Essays: Historical and Contemporary.
Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1960.
Brock, Peter. Paci¬sm in Europe to 1914. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press,
. Pioneers of the Peaceable Kingdom. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press,
. The Quaker Peace Testimony 1660 to 1914. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University
Press, 1990.
. Radical Paci¬sts in Antebellum America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University
Press, 1968.
Bronner, Edwin B. William Penn™s Holy Experiment: The Founding of Pennsylvania,
1681“1701. New York: Temple University Publications; distributed by Columbia
University Press, 1962.
Brunhouse, Robert L. The Counter-Revolution in Pennsylvania, 1776“1790. Harris-
burg: Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission, 1971.
Burgess, Glenn. The Politics of the Ancient Constitution: An Introduction to English
Political Thought, 1603“1642. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press,
Bury, J. B. The Idea of Progress: An Inquiry into Its Growth and Origin. New York:
Dover Publications, 1932.
Calhoon, Robert M. The Loyalists in the American Revolution, 1760“1781. New York:
Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1973.
. The Loyalist Persuasion and Other Essays. Columbia: University of South
Carolina Press, 1989.
. Political Moderation in America™s First Two Centuries. New York: Cambridge
University Press, 2008.
Cantor, Geoffrey. Quakers, Jews, and Science: Religious Responses to Modernity and
the Sciences, 1650“1900. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
Cappon, Lester J., et al., eds. The Atlas of Early American History: The Revolutionary
Era, 1760“1790. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1976.
Caul¬eld, Anna Breiner. Quakers in Fiction: An Annotated Bibliography. Northampton,
MA: Pittenbruach Press, 1993.
Childress, James F. Civil Disobedience and Political Obligation: A Study in Christian
Social Ethics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1971.
Chu, Jonathan. Neighbors, Friends, or Madmen: The Puritan Adjustment to Quak-
erism in Seventeenth-Century Massachusetts Bay. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press,
Clark, J. C. D. The Language of Liberty, 1660“1832: Political Discourse and Social
Dynamics in the Anglo-American World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
346 Bibliography

Colbourn, H. Trevor. The Lamp of Experience: Whig History and the Intellectual
Origins of the American Revolution. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press,
Collins, Varnum Lansing. Continental Congress at Princeton. Princeton, NJ: University
Library, 1908.
Como, David R. Blown by the Spirit: Puritanism and the Emergence of an Antinomian
Underground in Pre-Civil War England. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press,
Conway, Moncure Daniel. The Life of Thomas Paine. New York: G. P. Putnam™s Sons,
Cooney, Robert, and Helen Michalowski, eds. The Power of the People: Active Non-
Violence in the United States. Philadelphia: New Society, 1987.
Cowie, John, and William Hammond. Alliterative Anomalies for Infants and Invalids.
New York: Dodd, Mead & Co., 1913.
Craine, Elaine Forman. The Diary of Elizabeth Drinker: The Life Cycle of an
Eighteenth-Century Woman. Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1994.
Crane, Verner W. Benjamin Franklin and a Rising People. Boston: Little, Brown, 1954.
Curry, Thomas. The First Freedoms: Church and State in America to the Passage of the
First Amendment. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.
Damrosch, Leo. The Sorrows of the Quaker Jesus: James Nayler and the Puritan Crack-
down on the Free Spirit. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.
Dandelion, Pink. The Creation of Quaker Theory: Insider Perspectives. Burlington, VT:
Ashgate, 2004.
Daniels, Bruce C., ed. Power and Status: Of¬ce Holding in Colonial America. Middle-
town, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1986.
Daniels, Bruce C. Puritans at Play: Leisure and Recreation in Colonial New England.
New York: St. Martin™s Press, 1995.
Davis, David Brion. The Problem of Slavery in Western Culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell
University Press, 1966.
D™Emilio, John. Lost Prophet: The Life and Times of Bayard Rustin. Chicago: University
of Chicago Press, 2003.
Diggins, John Patrick. The Lost Soul of American Politics: Virtue, Self-Interest, and the
Foundations of American Liberalism. New York: Basic Books, 1984.
Drake, Thomas E. Quakers and Slavery in America. New Haven, CT: Yale University
Press, 1950.
Dunn, John. The Political Thought of John Locke: An Historical Account of the Argu-
ment of “The Two Treatises of Government.” Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 1969; rpt. 1995.
Dunn, Mary Maples. William Penn: Politics and Conscience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press, 1967.
Echeverria, Durand. Mirage in the West: A History of the French View of American
Society to 1815. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1968.
Elazar, Daniel J. American Federalism: A View from the States, 3rd ed., New York:
Harper and Row, 1984.
Endy, Melvin B. William Penn and Early Quakerism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univer-
sity Press, 1973.
Eshleman, H. Frank. The Constructive Genius of David Lloyd in Early Colonial Penn-
sylvania Legislation and Jurisprudence, 1686“1731. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania Bar
Association, 1910.
Bibliography 347

Ewen, David. Songs of America: A Cavalcade of Popular Songs. Chicago: Ziff-David
Publishing Co., 1947.
Fay, Bernard. The Revolutionary Spirit in France and America. Ramon Guthrie, trans.
New York: Harcourt, 1927.
Ferling, John E. A Leap in the Dark: The Struggle to Create the American Republic.
New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
. The Loyalist Mind: Joseph Galloway and the American Revolution. University
Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1977.
Flower, Milton E. John Dickinson, Conservative Revolutionary. Charlottesville: Uni-
versity Press of Virginia, 1983.
Foner, Eric. Tom Paine and Revolutionary America. New York: Oxford University
Press, 1976.
Fredman, Lionel. John Dickinson: American Revolutionary Statesman. Charlottesville,
NY: SamHar Press, 1974.
Freeman, Joanne. Affairs of Honor: National Politics in the New Republic. New Haven,
CT: Yale University Press, 2002.
Frost, J. William. The Keithian Controversy in Early Pennsylvania. Norwood, PA:
Norwood, 1980.
. A Perfect Freedom: Religious Liberty in Pennsylvania. New York: Cambridge
University Press, 1990.
Gallagher, Lowell. Medusa™s Gaze: Casuistry and Conscience in the Renaissance. Stan-
ford: Stanford University Press, 1991.
Garraty, John Arthur, and Mark C. Carnes. American National Biography. New York:
Oxford University Press, 1999.
Gaustad, Edwin Scott. Historical Atlas of Religion in America. New York: Harper and
Row, 1962.
Gerona, Carla. Night Journeys: The Power of Dreams in Transatlantic Quaker Culture.
Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2004.
Gilje, Paul A. Rioting in America. Interdisciplinary Studies in History. Bloomington and
Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1996.
Gough, J. W. Fundamental Law in English Constitutional History. Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 1955.
Green, Thomas Andrew. Verdict according to Conscience: Perspectives on the English
Criminal Trial Jury, 1200“1800. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985.
Greene, Jack P. Negotiated Authorities: Essays in Colonial Political and Constitutional
History. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1994.
. Peripheries and Center: Constitutional Development in the Extended Polities
of the British Empire and the United States, 1607“1788. New York: W. W. Norton
and Co., 1990.
Guenther, Karen. “Rememb™ring our Time and Work is the Lords”: The Experiences of
Quakers on the Eighteenth-Century Pennsylvania Frontier. Selinsgrove, PA: Susque-
hanna University Press, 2005.
Guide to the Micro¬lm of the Records of Pennsylvania™s Revolutionary Governments,
1776“1790. Harrisburg: Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission, 1978.
Hale, Edward Everett. Franklin in France. Boston: Roberts Bros., 1887“88.
Hamburger, Philip. Separation of Church and State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univer-
sity Press, 2002.
Hamm, Thomas D. God™s Government Begun: The Society for Universal Inquiry and
Reform, 1842“1846. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1995.
348 Bibliography

. The Transformation of American Quakerism: Orthodox Friends, 1800“1907.
Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1988.
Harris, Tim. Politics under the Later Stuarts: Party Con¬‚ict in a Divided Society, 1660“
1715. New York: Longman, 1993.
Hart, Benjamin. Faith and Freedom: The Christian Roots of American Liberty. San
Bernardino: Here™s Life Publishers, 1988.
Hatton, Jean. George Fox: A Biography of the Founder of the Quakers. Oxford:
Monarch, 2007.
Heffner, William Clinton. The History of Poor Relief Legislation in Pennsylvania,
1682“1913. Cleona, PA: Holzapfel, 1913.
Herndon, Ruth Wallis. Unwelcome Americans: Living on the Margin in Early New
England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2001.
Hewitt, Nancy A. Women™s Activism and Social Change: Rochester, New York, 1822“
1872. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984.
Heyrman, Christine Leigh. Southern Cross: The Beginnings of the Bible Belt. New York:
Alfred A. Knopf, 1997.
Hill, Christopher. Experience of Defeat: Milton and Some Contemporaries. New York:
Viking, 1984.
. The Religion of Gerrard Winstanley. Oxford: The Past and Present Society,
. The World Turned Upside Down: Radical Ideas during the English Revolution.
New York: Viking Press, 1972.
Hinshaw, William Wade. The Encyclopedia of American Quaker Genealogy. Ann
Arbor, MI: Edwards Brothers, 1938.
Hoffert, Robert W. A Politics of Tensions: The Articles of Confederation and American
Political Ideas. Niwot, CO: University of Colorado Press, 1992.
Holton, Woody. Unruly Americans and the Origins of the Constitution. New York:
Hill and Wang, 2007.
Horle, Craig W., et al., eds. Lawmaking and Legislators: A Biographical Dictionary.
3 vols. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1991“97.
. Quakers and the English Legal System, 1660“1688. Philadelphia: University of
Pennsylvania Press, 1988.
Howe, Daniel Walker. Henry David Thoreau on the Duty of Civil Disobedience: An
Inaugural Lecture Delivered before the University of Oxford on 21 May 1990.
Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.
Hull, William I. William Penn: A Topical Biography. London: Oxford University Press,
Hutson, James H. The Founders on Religion: A Book of Quotations. Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press, 2005.
. Pennsylvania Politics, 1740“1770: The Movement for Royal Government and
Its Consequences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1972.
Ingle, H. Larry. Quakers in Con¬‚ict: The Hicksite Reformation. Knoxville: University
of Tennessee Press, 1986.
Ireland, Owen S. Religion, Ethnicity, and Politics: Ratifying the Constitution in Penn-
sylvania. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995.
Isserman, Maurice. If I Had a Hammer . . . The Death of the Old Left and the Birth of
the New Left. New York: Basic Books, 1987.
Jacobson, David L. John Dickinson and the Revolution in Pennsylvania, 1764“1776.
Berkeley: University of California Press, 1965.
Bibliography 349

James, Coy Hilton. Silas Deane: Patriot or Traitor? East Lansing: Michigan State Uni-
versity Press, 1975.
James, Sydney V. A People among Peoples: Quaker Benevolence in Eighteenth-Century
America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1963.
James, William. Varieties of Religious Experience. New York: Modern Library, 1936.
Jensen, Merrill. The Articles of Confederation: An Interpretation of the Social-
Constitutional History of the American Revolution, 1774“1781. Madison: University
of Wisconsin Press, 1940.
. The New Nation: A History of the United States during the Confederation,
1781“1789. New York: Knopf, 1950.
Jervis, Anderson. Bayard Rustin: The Troubles I™ve Seen: A Biography. New York:
HarperCollins Publishers, 1997.
Jones, J. R. The First Whigs: The Politics of the Exclusion Crisis, 1678“1683. New
York: Oxford University Press, 1961.
Jones, Rufus M. The Later Periods of Quakerism. Westwood, CT: Greenwood Press,
. The Quakers in the American Colonies. New York: W. W. Norton and Co.,
Jordan, Ryan. Slavery and the Meetinghouse: The Quakers and the Abolitionist
Dilemma, 1820“1865. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2007.
Kamensky, Jane. Governing the Tongue: The Politics of Speech in Early New England.
New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
Kammen, Michael. Spheres of Liberty: Changing Perceptions of Liberty in American
Culture. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1986.
Kashatus, William C. Con¬‚ict of Conviction: A Reappraisal of Quaker Involvement in
the American Revolution. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1990.
Kern, Kathi. Mrs. Stanton™s Bible. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2001.
Kirby, Ethyl Williams. George Keith, 1636“1716. New York: D. Appleton-Century
Company, 1942.
Konkle, Burton. Life and Times of Thomas Smith, 1754“1809. Philadelphia: Campion
& Company, 1904.
Korey, Marie Elena. The Books of Isaac Norris at Dickinson College. Carlisle, PA:
Dickinson College, 1976.
Kramer, Larry. The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review.
New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.
Kruman, Marc W. Between Authority and Liberty: State Constitution-Making
in Revolutionary America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press,
Kunze, Bonnelyn Young. Margaret Fell and the Rise of Quakerism. Stanford, CA:
Stanford University Press, 1994.
Lambert, Frank. The Founding Fathers and the Place of Religion in America. Princeton,
NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.
Lapsansky, Emma Jones, and Anne A. Verplanck. Quaker Aesthetics: Re¬‚ections on a
Quaker Ethic in Design and Consumption. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania
Press, 2003.
Larabee, Leonard. Conservatism in Early American History. New York: New York
University Press, 1948.
Larkin, Edward. Thomas Paine and the Literature of Revolution. New York: Cambridge
University Press, 2005.
350 Bibliography

Larson, Rebecca. Daughters of Light: Quaker Women Preaching and Prophesying in
the Colonies and Abroad, 1700“1775. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1999.
Lee, Wayne E. Crowds and Soldiers in Revolutionary North Carolina: The Culture of
Violence in Riot and War. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2001.
Levine, Daniel. Bayard Rustin and the Civil Rights Movement. New Brunswick, NJ:
Rutgers University Press, 2000.
Levy, Leonard. Original Intent and the Framer™s Constitution. New York: Macmillan,
Lockridge, Kenneth A. A New England Town: The First Hunred Years, Dedham, Mas-
sachusetts, 1636“1736. New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1970.
Lokken, Roy N. David Lloyd: Colonial Lawmaker. Seattle: University of Washington
Press, 1959.
Lunardini, Christine A. From Equal Suffrage to Equal Rights: Alice Paul and the Na-
tional Women™s Party, 1910“1928. New York: New York University Press, 1986.
Lutz, Donald S. The Origins of the American Constitutionalism. Baton Rouge: Univer-
sity of Louisiana Press, 1988.
Lynd, Straughton, ed. Intellectual Origins of American Radicalism. New York: Pan-
theon Books, 1968.
. Nonviolence in America: A Documentary History. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill,
Mack, Phyllis. Visionary Women: Ecstatic Prophesy in Seventeenth-Century England.
Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.
MacPherson, C. B. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke.
Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962.
Maier, Pauline. American Scripture: Making the Declaration of Independence. New
York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1997.
. From Resistance to Revolution: Colonial Radicals and the Development of
American Opposition to Britain, 1765“1776. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.,
Main, Jackson Turner. The Sovereign States, 1775“1783. New York: New Veiwpoints:
A Division of Franklin Watts, 1973.
Marietta, Jack D. The Reformation of American Quakerism, 1748“1783. Philadelphia:
University of Pennsylvania Press, 1984.
Marietta, Jack D., and G. S. Rowe. A Troubled Experiment: Crime and Justice in
Pennsylvania, 1682“1800. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2006.
Martin, James Kirby, and Mark Edward Lender. A Respectiable Army: The Military
Origins of the Republic, 1763“1789. Arlington Heights, IL: Harlan Davidson, 1982.
Masson, David. The Life of John Milton: Narrated in Connexion with the Political,
Ecclesiastical, and Literary History of his Time. 1896; rpt. New York: Peter Smith,
McCullough, David. John Adams. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2001.
McDonald, Forrest. Novus Ordo Seclorum: The Intellectual Origins of the Constitution.
Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 1985.
McDonald, Forrest, and Ellen Shapiro McDonald. Requiem: Variations on Eighteenth-
Century Themes. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1988.
McIlwain, Charles Howard. The American Revolution: A Constitutional Interpretation.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1966.
. Constitutionalism Ancient and Modern. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press,
Bibliography 351

. The High Court of Parliament and Its Supremacy. New Haven, CT: Yale
University Press, 1910.
Mekeel, Arthur J. The Relation of the Quakers to the American Revolution. Washing-
ton, DC: University Press of America, 1979.
Middlekauff, Robert. Glorious Cause: The American Revolution, 1763“1789. New
York: Oxford University Press, 1982.
Miller, Glenn T. Religious Liberty in America: History and Prospects. Philadelphia:
Westminster Press, 1976.
Miller, John C. Origins of the American Revolution. Boston: Little, Brown and Com-
pany, 1943.
Minda, Gary. Boycott in America: How Imagination and Ideology Shape the Legal
Mind. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1999.
Morgan, Edmund S. Inventing the People: The Rise of Popular Sovereignty in England
and America. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1988.
. The Puritan Dilemma: The Story of John Winthrop. New York: HarperCollins
Publisher, 1958.
. Visible Saints: The History of a Puritan Idea. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University
Press, 1963.
Morris, Richard B. The Forging of the Union, 1781“1789. New York: Harper and
Row, 1987.
Munroe, John. History of Delaware. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1979.
Murphy, Andrew R. Conscience and Community: Revisiting Toleration and Religious
Dissent in Early Modern England and America. University Park: Pennsylvania State
University Press, 2001.
Nash, Gary B. Quakers and Politics: Pennsylvania, 1681“1726. Princeton, 1968; rpt.
Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1993.
Nash, Gary B., and Jean Soderlund. Freedom by Degrees: Emancipation in Pennsylvania
and Its Aftermath. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.
Nelson, William H. The American Tory. New York: Oxford University Press, 1961.
Newcomb, Benjamin. Franklin and Galloway: A Political Partnership. New Haven, CT:
Yale University Press, 1972.
Newman, Paul Douglas. Fries™s Rebellion: The Enduring Struggle for the American
Revolution. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2005.
Odell, George C. D. Annals of the New York Stage. 15 vols. New York: Columbia
University, 1927“49.
Ogg, David. England in the Reign of Charles II. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1955.
Ousterhout, Anne M. A State Divided: Opposition in Pennsylvania to the American
Revolution. New York: Greenwood Press, 1987.
Pangle, Thomas. The Spirit of Modern Republicanism: The Moral Vision of the Found-
ing Fathers and the Philosophy of John Locke. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,
Pencak, William, Matthew Dennis, and Simon P. Newman, eds. Riot and Revelry in
Early America. University Park: Penn State University Press, 2003.
Perry, Lewis. Radical Abolitionism: Anarchy and the Government of God in Antislavery
Thought. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1973.
Peters, Kate. Print Culture and the Early Quakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 2005.
Philips, Edith. The Good Quaker in French Legend. Philadelphia: University of Penn-
sylvania Press, 1932.
352 Bibliography

Pocock, J. G. A. The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law: A Study of English
Historical Thought in the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 1957.
. Politics, Language, and Time: Essays on Political Thought and History.
Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1992.
Pollock, Thomas Clark. The Philadelphia Theatre in the Eighteenth Century. Philadel-
phia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1933.
Pomfret, John E. Colonial New Jersey: A History. New York: Scribner, 1973.
. The New Jersey Proprietors and their Lands, 1634“1776. Princeton, NJ: Van
Nostrand, 1964.
. The Province of West New Jersey, 1609“1702: A History of the Origins of an


. 11
( 12)